Do you need guidance? Become a member of IEH!
Would you like to know more about membership of IEH? Or perhaps you would like to arrange a non-binding meeting? Please contact us.
Ethical trade is all about making improvements. Improvement measures must be implemented in cooperation with the suppliers. In order to make lasting improvements, the suppliers themselves must see the point of implementing improvement measures and realise that your purchasing practices support these efforts.
As a member of IEH- Ethcial Trading Initiative Norway, you have access to advice and guidance, and a range of resources and tools in addition to those available on our open pages. IEH is an arena for network-building, and a meeting forum. IEH also offers courses and seminars, and capacity-building for your suppliers. Read more about the benefits of being a member in IEH.
A plan for improvements, often called a corrective action plan, is drawn up on the basis of information you have obtained by making your own observations, using SAQs, engaging external experts or by other means. The planning process involves agreeing with the supplier on what needs to be done, when it is to be done, and who is responsible for the various tasks. If you have engaged an external expert to conduct an audit for you, they will usually draw up a proposal for a corrective action plan.
In connection with the planning process, you must ensure that the supplier has the necessary resources and competence to carry out the tasks that he or she is responsible for. This is, of course, essential if you are to succeed in making improvements. Several actors, e.g. ETI-Norway, provide training and resources for suppliers. The corrective action plan is signed by both you and the supplier. When trading with an importer or an agent, your job is to ensure that the agent contributes to improving conditions at the facilities of their suppliers as described in this chapter. The figure below shows an excerpt from a corrective action plan.
The supplier must follow up the implementation of the corrective action plan. It is therefore important that the measures in the plan are clearly described, that clear and realistic deadlines for implementation are set, and that responsibility for implementation of the various tasks is defined.
Some companies choose to reward suppliers for complying with the corrective action plan, for example by giving them the status of priority suppliers. Is this a feasible idea for you?
Furthermore, you must consider what to do if the supplier proves uninterested in implementing the improvement measures you have agreed on. Poor working conditions in themselves are not a reason for terminating cooperation with a supplier. However, if the supplier is unwilling to make changes, then cooperation should be reconsidered. Before you terminate the business relationship, you must be certain that you have clearly conveyed what you want changed, why it is important to you, and what the consequences of failing to follow up on this will be. You must also find out why the planned improvement measures were not implemented. Was the basis for the plan unrealistic? Did the supplier lack the necessary expertise to implement the measures? Were the measures too expensive? Was there anything your company could have done differently?
Detecting shortcomings and deficiencies is one thing; knowing what defines good practice is another. Below you will find examples of good practice and how good practice can be documented.
The supplier must follow up the implementation of the corrective action plan. It is therefore important that the measures in the plan are clearly described, that clear and realistic deadlines for implementation are set, and that responsibility for implementation of the various tasks is defined.
Some companies choose to reward suppliers for complying with the corrective action plan, for example by giving them the status of priority suppliers. Is this a feasible idea for you?
Furthermore, you must consider what to do if the supplier proves uninterested in implementing the improvement measures you have agreed on. Poor working conditions in themselves are not a reason for terminating cooperation with a supplier. However, if the supplier is unwilling to make changes, then cooperation should be reconsidered. Before you terminate the business relationship, you must be certain that you have clearly conveyed what you want changed, why it is important to you, and what the consequences of failing to follow up on this will be. You must also find out why the planned improvement measures were not implemented. Was the basis for the plan unrealistic? Did the supplier lack the necessary expertise to implement the measures? Were the measures too expensive? Was there anything your company could have done differently?
Poor working conditions are a matter that primarily concerns the workers at the production site. They are the ones who experience the strain first-hand and are therefore in the best position to describe the problems and identify solutions.
If the workers belong to a trade union, then employee representatives are important partners in the improvement process.
In Norway, we have a long tradition of dialogue between management and trade unions on company conditions. If the company and the union have an opportunity to share their experience with their suppliers’ workers and management, this provides a basis for involving workers in the process of improving conditions in the supplier’s operations.
In countries where the legal system does not allow for trade unions taking the role described above, alternative methods can be used to involve the workers. One example is giving the workers’ HSE committee a role in the improvement processes.
Improving working conditions at the production site usually has a cost. Who should pay for it: you or the supplier? As a general rule, the supplier must bear the costs of bringing their own operations up to an acceptable standard. However, a supplier could be either a poor farmer in rural India or a multinational concern worth billions. Therefore, the answer to this question depends on context. A supplier who makes large investments or pays their workers higher wages in response to your demands will probably have to raise their prices, which in turn means that you have to be willing to pay a higher price.
When you trade with an importer or an agent, your job is to ensure that they help their suppliers to make improvements as described in this chapter.
Below is a selection of resources and tools related to how you best can collaborate with your supplier about improvements. A membership in IEH gives you access to more resources and tools in addition to ongoing counseling and follow-up in your work with ethical trade.
Would you like to know more about membership of IEH? Or perhaps you would like to arrange a non-binding meeting? Please contact us.
We have created this guide to show that ethical trading is feasible and produces results even for small and medium enterprises, and that it really is all about getting started.
Read more »A corrective action plan (CAP) outlines how defaults and non-compliance with a buyers code of conduct should be addressed. The planning process involves agreeing with the supplier on what needs to be done, when it is to be done, and who is responsibl...
Read more »The Local Resources Network (LRN) is a network of local organisations which can assist in surveys and improvement efforts. IEH - Ethical Trading Initiative Norway members have free access to the LRN.
Read more »In 2007 Beer Sten was accused of having terribe working conditions and child labour at one of their suppliers in India. Monica Sander talks about how they experienced the accusations, and how the company worked together with the suppliers to make imp...
Read more »